<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More left or more right?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davecole.org/blog/2006/11/21/more-left-or-more-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2006/11/21/more-left-or-more-right/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, notes and comments</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gracchi</title>
		<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2006/11/21/more-left-or-more-right/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Gracchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=129#comment-102</guid>
		<description>I'm going to ahve a go at this though I would reckon it would need a longer answer than a comment makes available. I'd say we were more socially liberal in 45 got less so into the 50s then became more polarised into the sixties, seventies and eighties and now are much more socially liberal than we've ever been. As for economics0 you undo me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I also think its very difficult because there are various kinds of social liberalism etc going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to ahve a go at this though I would reckon it would need a longer answer than a comment makes available. I&#8217;d say we were more socially liberal in 45 got less so into the 50s then became more polarised into the sixties, seventies and eighties and now are much more socially liberal than we&#8217;ve ever been. As for economics0 you undo me.</p>
<p>I also think its very difficult because there are various kinds of social liberalism etc going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
