<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guido Fawkes on Newsnight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davecole.org/blog/2007/03/29/guido-fawkes-on-newsnight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2007/03/29/guido-fawkes-on-newsnight/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, notes and comments</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: El Dave.</title>
		<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2007/03/29/guido-fawkes-on-newsnight/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>El Dave.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=218#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Rubbish. The intent was clear when he said that his source was Nick Robinson. Either that, or his sources are the parts of the "main stream media" he claims to loathe.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm sure he's not an NUJ member because he would have been given the boot a while ago. However, the NUJ code is a code of ethics that I think has value. It's not perfect, but dropping your sources in it is poor form no matter which way you look at it. I used the NUJ bit as a citation, if you like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rubbish. The intent was clear when he said that his source was Nick Robinson. Either that, or his sources are the parts of the &#8220;main stream media&#8221; he claims to loathe.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s not an NUJ member because he would have been given the boot a while ago. However, the NUJ code is a code of ethics that I think has value. It&#8217;s not perfect, but dropping your sources in it is poor form no matter which way you look at it. I used the NUJ bit as a citation, if you like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2007/03/29/guido-fawkes-on-newsnight/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=218#comment-183</guid>
		<description>um, the source Staines refers to as Nick Robinson, is a report he did on World At One about Ruth Turner. As he does explain on his blog. Doesn't come across too well.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But not exactly an NUJ breach (not that I imagine he has much time for any form of union).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um, the source Staines refers to as Nick Robinson, is a report he did on World At One about Ruth Turner. As he does explain on his blog. Doesn&#8217;t come across too well.</p>
<p>But not exactly an NUJ breach (not that I imagine he has much time for any form of union).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
