<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conspiratorial liberals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/</link>
	<description>Dave Cole&#039;s thoughts on politics, culture and modern life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:51:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jameshigham</title>
		<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>jameshigham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/#comment-412</guid>
		<description>We righties are always harping, Dave.  Still, a good read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We righties are always harping, Dave.  Still, a good read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/#comment-411</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I try not to use those terms. They are a shorthand, and they are misleading. I think the political compass is a better way of doing it, but association with a particular world-view or set of ideas is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I try not to use those terms. They are a shorthand, and they are misleading. I think the political compass is a better way of doing it, but association with a particular world-view or set of ideas is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winchester whisperer</title>
		<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Winchester whisperer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/#comment-410</guid>
		<description>How do you define &quot;left&quot; and &quot;right&quot; these days?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you define &#8220;left&#8221; and &#8220;right&#8221; these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Well, thankyou Aaron!

I don&#039;t think the echo-chamber accusation stands up. The different people on LC - from Dave Osler to Chris Dillow - give the lie to that.

Anyway, hope you keep reading the quite liberal and slightly conspiratorial blog of Dave Cole :)

xD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, thankyou Aaron!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the echo-chamber accusation stands up. The different people on LC &#8211; from Dave Osler to Chris Dillow &#8211; give the lie to that.</p>
<p>Anyway, hope you keep reading the quite liberal and slightly conspiratorial blog of Dave Cole <img src='http://davecole.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>xD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Heath</title>
		<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

&lt;em&gt;I’m delighted to have someone think my comments are worth reproducing and to have them on a blog like Liberal Conspiracy, so thank-you Sunny.&lt;/em&gt;

Of course your comments &quot;are worth reproducing&quot;. LC may have been dismissed - several times - as an echo-chamber for the &quot;liberal elite&quot;, but in my opinion, the platform has to be used to widen debate, bringing in many more voices from beyond the usual suspects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p><em>I’m delighted to have someone think my comments are worth reproducing and to have them on a blog like Liberal Conspiracy, so thank-you Sunny.</em></p>
<p>Of course your comments &#8220;are worth reproducing&#8221;. LC may have been dismissed &#8211; several times &#8211; as an echo-chamber for the &#8220;liberal elite&#8221;, but in my opinion, the platform has to be used to widen debate, bringing in many more voices from beyond the usual suspects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/2007/11/18/conspiratorial-liberals/#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Dave,

Well, if you hadn&#039;t written that comment in that thread, I&#039;d have tried to write the poor man&#039;s version. But you did it far better than I would have done, and did it very succinctly.

Clarified - for me at least - what was an itch, about what was wrong with that thread. I thought it was a very good comment. And deserved it&#039;s promotion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>Well, if you hadn&#8217;t written that comment in that thread, I&#8217;d have tried to write the poor man&#8217;s version. But you did it far better than I would have done, and did it very succinctly.</p>
<p>Clarified &#8211; for me at least &#8211; what was an itch, about what was wrong with that thread. I thought it was a very good comment. And deserved it&#8217;s promotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
