<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Haltemprice and Howden by-election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davecole.org/blog/2008/07/11/the-haltemprice-and-howden-by-election-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2008/07/11/the-haltemprice-and-howden-by-election-2/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, notes and comments</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2008/07/11/the-haltemprice-and-howden-by-election-2/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=692#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>Ah!

Certainly, attaching yourself to Mr Davis would have brought more coverage than attaching yourself to Ms Oakes. I return to the danger of single-issue elections.

xD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah!</p>
<p>Certainly, attaching yourself to Mr Davis would have brought more coverage than attaching yourself to Ms Oakes. I return to the danger of single-issue elections.</p>
<p>xD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2008/07/11/the-haltemprice-and-howden-by-election-2/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=692#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>Sorry Dave, what I meant was that maybe Davis's coat tails offered a more fancy ride for some than Shan Oakes's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Dave, what I meant was that maybe Davis&#8217;s coat tails offered a more fancy ride for some than Shan Oakes&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2008/07/11/the-haltemprice-and-howden-by-election-2/#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=692#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>Justin,

I wholeheartedly agree. I was really disappointed when Tony Benn came out batting for Davis and not the Greens.

What's the immediate, cynical conclusion? That Labour wants to maintain the two-and-a-half party system? Sorry, it's a bit early on a Saturday for me to be thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin,</p>
<p>I wholeheartedly agree. I was really disappointed when Tony Benn came out batting for Davis and not the Greens.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the immediate, cynical conclusion? That Labour wants to maintain the two-and-a-half party system? Sorry, it&#8217;s a bit early on a Saturday for me to be thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://davecole.org/blog/2008/07/11/the-haltemprice-and-howden-by-election-2/#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=692#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>What puzzle me slightly, and I need to ponder a little more on this, is why exactly many on the left thought it necessary to back Davis rather than the more liberal candidate on civil liberties (ie, the Greens). I'm trying very, very hard to reject the immediate, cynical conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What puzzle me slightly, and I need to ponder a little more on this, is why exactly many on the left thought it necessary to back Davis rather than the more liberal candidate on civil liberties (ie, the Greens). I&#8217;m trying very, very hard to reject the immediate, cynical conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
